Application of Exogenous Liquidity Risk Models to Analyze Single Assets

Yasir Salih, Riaman Riaman, Komar Komar, Alit Kartiwa

Abstract


Exogenous liquidity risk measurement is a measurement of liquidity risk that affects all market participants and is not affected by the actions of any other actors. Exogenous liquidity risk measurement is usually called the Cost of Liquidity (COL). The main problem is how the level of liquidity of one currency against other currencies and the effect of liquidity risk on VaR (Value at Risk) on a single asset. This thesis examines the importance of liquidity risk on a single asset. Combining basic VaR and liquidity risk will result in more effective calculations. The model used is to add the basic VaR value with the Cost of Liquidity (COL) or also called Liquidity VaR (L-VaR). The calculation results show the different effects of liquidity for each country's currency. Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) is the currency that has the highest liquidity component compared to the Japanese Yen (JPY) and the Thai Baht (THB). The lower the liquidity component of a currency, the currency is very liquid, and the Japanese Yen (JPY) is the most liquid currency compared to the Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) and the Thai Baht (THB).


Keywords


volatility, Value-at-Risk, liquidity, exogenous, liquidity costs.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aktas, C., Cortuk, O., Teker, S. & Yildirim, B.D. (2012). Measurement of Liquidity-Adjusted Market Risk by VaR

and Expected Shortfall: Evidence from Turkish Banks. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2(5), 137-147.

Alexander, C. (1999). Risk Management And Analysis Volume I Measuring And Modelling Financial Risk. New

York: Wiley.

Anam, A.K. (2013). Risiko Likuiditas dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika

Ekonomi & Bisnis, 10(1), 1-16.

Bangia, A., Diebold, F. X., Schuermann, T.& Stroughair, J. D. (1998). Modeling Liquidity Risk with Implications for Traditional Market Risk Measurement and Management. Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 99-06, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania. Bangia, A., Diebold, F. & Schuermann, T. (1999). Modeling Liquidity Risk with Implications for Traditional Market Risk Measurement and Management, (Online), (http://www.newyorkfed.org/. Dowd, K. (2002). An Introduction to Market Risk Measurement. New York: Wiley. Erwan, L. S. (2002). Incorporating Liquidity Risk in VaR Models. Research Gate, 1-23. Häberle, R. & Persson, P. G. (2000). Incorporating Market Liquidity Constraints in Value-at-Risk.Banques & Marchés,44, 14-19. Hogg, R. & Craig, A. (1995). Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Tsai, C.C. & Lee, T.S. (2017). Liquidity-Adjusted Value at Risk and Hellinger Distance Measure: Evidence from Taiwan Single Stock Futures. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 162, 39-53.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v1i1.15

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments
 |  Add comment

Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published By: 

IJBESD: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia


IJBESD Indexed By:

width=width=width= width= width= width= 

 

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.