Scandinavian Legal Realism in Two Criminal Convictions of The Same Thing

Siti Munawaroh; Sri Mulyati; Suhendri Suhendri

doi:10.46336/ijbesd.v3i1.188

Scandinavian Legal Realism in Two Criminal Convictions of The Same Thing

Siti Munawaroh, Sri Mulyati, Suhendri Suhendri

Abstract

Human life is regulated and will never be separated from the provisions of binding regulations. Binding rules or norms in human life have the purpose of creating order, justice, and public welfare. The paradigm of legal positivism has always relied on the logic and validation of the ruler which makes people think that the ruler is the only law. This is strongly criticized by legal realists. The interesting thing about legal realism is the view that law must depart from the study of facts. American legal realism states that a judge decides something based on his personal preferences, and then makes a legal analysis to justify the expected outcome. This is different from legal realism in Scandinavia, which is based on logical positivism that developed in the modern era. Legal realism in Scandinavia intends to make legal science more scientific. Criticisms of legal realism include: legal realism presents the law only as a tool for resolving disputes on a case by case basis, there is no need for legal certainty because the approach is very casuistic so that judge’s understanding of cases can vary widely. Using legal studies approach, be expected that it can provide an overview of the problems that occur related to Scandinavian Legal Realism in the adultery case of SS with minors which is contrary to The Law of Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection in conjunction with Article 65 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code. The judge's authority over the case is to give a verdict related to the SS case in accordance with positive law, the facts that actually happened, and the truth of the case that has been observed by the people involved and legal experts with the aim of maintaining order and protecting the community so that they always do the right thing.

Keywords

Scandinavian Legal Realism, Criminal Cases, Adultery

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books

Aburaera, Sukarno, dkk. (2013). Filsafat Hukum, Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ali., Achmad., & Heryani, Wiwie. (2012). Sosiologi Hukum (Kajian Empiris Terhadap Pengadilan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Atmadja, I Dewa Gede & Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu. (2018). Teori – Teori Hukum. Malang: Setara Press.

Chazawi, A. (2002). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Chazawi, A. (2016). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagiam 2 Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Darmodiharjo, Darji & Shidarta. (2004). Pokok – Pokok Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Guwandi, J. (2004). Dinamika Etika dan Hukum Kedokteran Dalam Tantangan Zaman. Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran UI.

Hiariej, E.O.S. (2016). Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Adma Pustaka.

Marzuki, P.M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Suadi, Amran. (2018). Sosiologi Hukum, Penegakan, Realitas dan Nilai Moralitas Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Journal article

Baybee, Keith J. (2005). Legal Realism Common Courtesy, and Hypocrisy. 1(1), 75 – 77.

Pattaro, Enrico. (2010). I Will Tell You about Axel Hagerstrom: His Ontology and Theory of Judgement. 23(1), 123 – 156.

Journal article with DOI

Rato, Dominikus. (2021). Realisme Hukum: Peradilan Adat dalam Perspektif Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 1(2), 285 – 308. Doi: https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v1i2.24998.

Terisno, Prisilia Anggraini Evelyn dan Angela, Yuliana. (2019). Penjatuhan Dua Putusan Perkara Pidana dalam Suatu Objek Perkara yang Sama. Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 22 – 23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v1i1.

Journal article retrieved from database without DOI

Abdullah, Junaidi. (2015). Refleksi dan Relevansi Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum Bagi Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 6(1), 181 – 199. Retrived from https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id.

Ahmad, K., & Djanggih, H. (2017). Batasan Penerapan Asas Persidangan Terbuka untuk Umum dalam Siaran Persidangan Pidana oleh Media. Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, 24(3), 488 – 505. Retrived from https://journal.ilininstitute.com/index.php/IJoCL.

Rahmatullah, Indra. (2021). Filsafat Realisme Hukum (Legal Realism): Konsep dan Aktualisasinya dalam Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia. Adalah Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(3), 11 – 22. Retrived from https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id.

Roesli, M., Syafi’i, A., & Amalia, A. (2018). Kajian Islam Tentang Partisipasi Orang Tua dalam Pendidikan Anak. Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 9(2), 332 – 345. Retrived from https://journal.ilininstitute.com/index.php/IJoCL.

The Books of Law

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Pasal 84 Ayat 2

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Pasal 141

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 10

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 64

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 65 Ayat 1

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 76

Undang – Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak Jo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v3i1.188