The Managerial Performance of Megou Pak Tulang Bawang University

Okta Malinda, Endang Susilowati, Lely Marce Margareta

Abstract


The changes in the regulation of accreditation criteria from 7 standards to 9 standards and the inconsistency of the results of previous research regarding the effect of incentives, non-financial performance, and leadership style on managerial performance have become an interest in conducting this research again. This study aims to provide empirical evidence about the effect of incentives, non-financial performance, and leadership style on managerial megou pak tulang bawang university performance. This research was conducted at megou pak tulang bawang university in menggala Lampung with its unit of analysis Good-accredited study program which has 12 study programs, consisting of samples obtained from as many as 121 Lecturer. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The data analysis method used is a quantitative method that the multiple regression analysis tested with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) V24. This study's results indicate that incentives consisting of bonuses, rewards, and professional and honor allowances have a significant positive effect on managerial performance. The non-financial performance, which consists of the work and environmental dimensions, has a significant positive effect on managerial performance. Leadership styles which consist of participative style, authoritarian style, and task-oriented style significantly negatively affect managerial performance. The implication of this research is to provide additional indicators such as the professional allowances & honor in incentive variable indicators not only limited to bonuses and rewards.


Keywords


Managerial Performance, Incentives, Non-financial Performance, Leadership Style

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bryan, J. F., & Locke, E. A. (1967). Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. Journal of applied psychology, 51(3), 274.

Burney, L. L., & Widener, S. K. (2013). Behavioral work outcomes of a strategic performance measurement system-based incentive plan. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(2), 115-143.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.

Chng, D. H. M., Rodgers, M. S., Shih, E., & Song, X. B. (2012). When does incentive compensation motivate managerial behaviors? An experimental investigation of the fit between incentive compensation, executive core self‐evaluation, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(12), 1343-1362.

Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (1998). Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of accounting research, 36, 1-35.

Meng, D., & Tian, G. (2013). Multi-task incentive contract and performance measurement with multidimensional types. Games and Economic Behavior, 77(1), 377-404.

Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Vohra, N. (2013). Organizational behavior. Person Education limited: pearson. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2003). Research Methods for Business, A Skill Building Approach, John Willey & Sons. Inc. New York.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v3i3.307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Add comment

Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published By: 

IJBESD: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia


IJBESD Indexed By:

width=width=width= width= width= width= 

 

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.