Measuring the Effectiveness of Differential Calculus Learning Using Open Ended Based Teaching Materials

Mariyan Yurechko, Evgen Pryimak

Abstract


This study aims to produce differential calculus teaching materials using a good (valid, practical and effective) open-ended approach to improve students' critical and creative thinking skills, and compare their effectiveness with teaching materials prepared in the context of implementing the implemented curriculum. This research is research and development (Research and Development). The development models referred to are the modified Dick & Carey and Borg & Gall models. The steps in this development are researching and gathering information, developing teaching, selecting and developing teaching materials, initial trials, revisions, main trials, and final product revisions. Initial trials and main trials are carried out in a university. Product validity is validated by experts. Product practicality is assessed by product users, namely lecturers and students. Product effectiveness was tested using an inferential statistical test by looking at the significant differences in the mean of the pretest and posttest scores in terms of students' critical and creative thinking abilities. Next, the effectiveness will be compared between the control class and the experimental class. The results of the research show that the product developed is in the very valid category according to the experts, practical according to the teacher's assessment, and very practical according to the students. The resulting product is also effective, even more effective when compared to teaching materials in terms of critical and creative thinking skills student.


Keywords


development, teaching materials, open-ended approach, critical thinking skills, abilities creative thinking.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dewanto, S. 2008. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Multipel Representasi Mahasiswa melalui Problem-based Learning. Disertasi pada SPS UPI. Tidak Diterbitkan.

Eggen, P. D. and Kauchak. 1988. Strategies for Teachers : Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.

Ferrini-Mundy, J. dan Graham, K. G. 1991. An Overview of the Calculus Curriculum Reform Effort: Issues for Learning, Teaching, and Curriculum Development. The American Mathematical Monthly, 98(7), 627-635, dari http:// portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=115400. diunduh 28 April 2008.

Hake, R. 1999. Analizing Change/Gain Scores, dari http://www.physics. indiana.edu/-sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf. diunduh 7 Februari 2009.

Inprashita, M. 2004. Open-ended Approach and Teacher Education. dari http://www.criced.tsukuba. ac.jp/math/apec2006/progress_report/Symposium/Imprasitha_a.pdf. diunduh 15 Mei 2008.

Kemp, J.E., Morisson, G.R., & Ross, S.M. 1994. Designing Effective Instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing, Inc.

Meltzer, D.E. 2002. Addendum to: “The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gain in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostics Pretest Score”. dari http://www.physics.iastate.edu/per/docs/ addendum.on.normalized. gain. diunduh 7 Februari 2009

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Drive, Reston, VA: The NCTM.

Nohda, N. 1999. A Study Of “Open-Approach” Method In School Mathematics Teaching – Focusing On Mathematical Problem Solving Activities, dari http://www. nku.edu/~sheffield/nohda.html. diunduh 31 Maret 2008.

Sawada, T. 1997. Developing Lesson Plans dalam Shimada, S. dan Becker, J.P. (Ed). The Open Ended Approach. A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: VA NCTM.

Shimada, S. 1997. The Significance of an Open Ended Approach dalam Shimada, S. dan Becker, J.P. (Ed). The Open Ended Approach. A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. Reston: VA NCTM.

Silver, E. A. 1997. Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing. dari http://www.fizkarlsruhe.de/fiz/ publications/zdm/2dm97343.pdf. diunduh 19 Mei 2008

Thiagarajan, S., Summel, DS., Summel, M. 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Expectional Children. A Source Book. Bloomington: Center of Innovation on Teaching the Handicapped. Minnepolis: Indian University.

Yerushalmy, M. 1997. Designing Representations: Reasoning about Functions of Two Variables. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 431-466.

Zachariades, T., Christou, C., dan Papageorgiou, E. 2002. The Difficulties and Reasoning of Undergraduate Mathematics Students in the Identification of Functions. University of Athens.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v2i4.388

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Mariyan Yurechko, Evgen Pryimak

Published By: 

IJEER: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia


IJEER Indexed By:

width=width= width= width= width= 

 

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats