Development of Writing Teaching Materials with a Contextual Approach of Public Junior High School (SMPN 1), Pinang City, South Labuhan Batu, Indonesia

Dewi Wahyuni, Risnawaty Risnawaty, Sutikno Sutikno, Rahmat Kartolo

Abstract


Based on observations from interviews with Indonesian language and literature teachers at SMPN 1, Pinang City, South Labuhan Batu, Indonesia, it is known that students' writing skills still need to be improved. Only 60% of students who are able to write instructions properly and correctly, the rest still have difficulty in writing instructions. In this study, there are two categories of research data sources. First, the data source for the prototype needs of teaching materials consists of students and teachers. Second, the prototype validation data source that will assess the prototype of teaching materials writing instructions with a contextual approach. Sources of data needs prototype teaching materials in this study are students and teachers. Sources of prototype validation data that assess the product development of this research are teachers and expert lecturers. The main finding of this study is the average value given by three teachers and two experts on the prototype of teaching materials for writing instructions with a contextual approach, namely (1) aspects of material presentation of 69.79 included in the good category, (2) aspects of content /material of 79.17 is included in the good category, and (3) aspects of language and readability of 80.42 are included in the good category. After making improvements based on the results of assessments and suggestions by teachers and experts, the teaching materials write instructions with the Contextual after repair contains material on the meaning of writing instructions, characteristics that need to be considered in writing instructions, steps for writing instructions, examples of writing instructions, and effective sentences.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, F., Fakhruddin, T., & Khasanah, K. (2018). The Development of Pop-Up Book Media to Improve 4th Grade Student’s Learning Outcomes of Civic Education. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology, 4(1), 43-50.

Amalia, H., Abdullah, F., & Fatimah, A. S. (2021). Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(S2), 794-810.

Atmowardoyo, H. (2018). Research methods in TEFL studies: Descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197-204.

Gayo, H., & Widodo, P. (2018). An analysis of morphological and syntactical errors on the English writing of junior high school Indonesian students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(4), 58-70.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 445.

Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard educational review, 81(4), 710-744.

Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of educational psychology, 104(4), 879.

Gustiani, S. (2019). Research And Development (R&D) Method As A Model Design In Educational Research And Its Alternatives. Holistics, 11(2), 12-22.

Johnstone, K. M., Ashbaugh, H., & Warfield, T. D. (2002). Effects of repeated practice and contextual-writing experiences on college students' writing skills. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 305-315.

Kellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A. (2007). Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 14(2), 237-242.

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of writing research, 1(1), 1-26.

Klimova, B. F. (2014). Approaches to the teaching of writing skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 147-151.

Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education and information technologies, 13(4), 279-290.

Miller, C. J., McNear, J., & Metz, M. J. (2013). A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Advances in physiology education, 37(4), 347-355.

Muhammad, A. U., Bala, D., & Ladu, K. M. (2016). Effectiveness of Demonstration and Lecture Methods in Learning Concept in Economics among Secondary School Students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 51-59.

Ningsih, S. (2016). Guided writing to improve the students’ writing ability of junior high school students. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(2), 129-140.

Pazhoman, H., & Sarkhosh, M. (2019). The Relationship between Iranian English High School Teachers' Reflective Practices, Their Self-Regulation and Teaching Experience. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 995-1010.

Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijrcs.v3i2.266

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Research in Community Services

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published By: 

IJRCS: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Indexed By: 

width= width=width=  width=  width= 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats