Comparative Analysis of LSTM and GRU Models for Ethereum (ETH) Price Prediction

Moch Panji Agung Saputra, Riza Andrian Ibrahim, Renda Sandi Saputra

Abstract


The increasing use of cryptocurrencies has changed the dynamics of investment, presenting both opportunities and challenges for investors. Although various studies have compared the performance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) in predicting financial asset prices, there are still differences in results regarding which model is superior. Therefore, this study aims to compare the performance of LSTM and GRU in predicting Ethereum prices using a hyperparameter tuning approach. The data used is historical data of Ethereum (ETH) shares from 2020 to 2025. The research methodology includes data preprocessing using Min-Max scaling, model development with various layer configurations, and comprehensive evaluation using several performance metrics. The results show that the GRU Model provides superior performance with a lower Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.0234 and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.0168, compared to LSTM's RMSE of 0.0265 and MAE of 0.0193. While LSTM exhibits a slightly better Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 18.08% compared to GRU at 18.17%, the GRU model achieves a higher R² Score of 0.9442 compared to LSTM at 0.9282. Visual analysis of the prediction patterns and residual distributions further demonstrates GRU’s more consistent and accurate performance in capturing Ethereum price movements. These findings suggest that while both models are effective for cryptocurrency price prediction, GRU offers slightly better overall performance and stability, especially in maintaining consistent prediction accuracy across different market conditions.

Keywords


Ethereum price prediction, deep learning, long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), cryptocurrency, hyperparameter tuning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdiwi, F. G. (2024). Detection of Digital Currency Fraud through a Distributed Database Approach and Machine Learning Model. TEM Journal, 13(4), 3025-3039.

Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. Peerj computer science, 7, e623.

Jo, J. M. (2019). Effectiveness of normalization pre-processing of big data to the machine learning performance. The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences, 14(3), 547-552.

Jubaedah, D., Ahyani, H., Putra, H. M., Prakasa, A., & Mutmainah, N. (2022). Legal Analysis of Crypto Investment in Era 4.0 View from Credo Theory. Diponegoro Law Review, 7(2), 262-278.

Kale, S. (2022). They couldn’t even scream any more. they were just sobbing’: The amateur investors ruined by the crypto crash [WWW document]. The Guardian. URL https://www. theguardian. com/technology/2022/jul/12/they-couldnt-even-scream-any-m o re-they-were-just-sobbing-the-amateur-investors-ruined-by-the-crypto-cras h (accessed 7.14. 22).

Kambezidis, H. D. (2021). The Solar Radiation Climate of Greece. Climate, 9(12), 183.

Karunasingha, D. S. K. (2022). Root mean square error or mean absolute error? Use their ratio as well. Information Sciences, 585, 609-629.

Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2016). A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(3), 669-679.

Qi, J., Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, C. (2025). Cryptocurrency Investments: The Role of Advisory Sources, Investor Confidence, and Risk Perception in Shaping Behaviors and Intentions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(2), 57.

Rahmadeyan, A. (2024). Long Short-Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Unit for Stock Price Prediction. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 204-212.

Raju, V. G., Lakshmi, K. P., Jain, V. M., Kalidindi, A., & Padma, V. (2020, August). Study the influence of normalization/transformation process on the accuracy of supervised classification. In 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) (pp. 729-735). IEEE.

Spüler, M., Sarasola-Sanz, A., Birbaumer, N., Rosenstiel, W., & Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2015, August). Comparing metrics to evaluate performance of regression methods for decoding of neural signals. In 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 1083-1086). IEEE.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v6i1.887

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published By: 

IJBESD: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia


IJBESD Indexed By:

width=width=width= width= width= width= 

 

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.