Study on Structural Equation Modeling for Analyzing Data

M. Ihsan Khairi, Dwi Susanti, Sukono Sukono

Abstract


Structural Equation Model (SEM) is a combination of two separate statistical methods, namely factor analysis developed in psychology and psychometry and simultaneous equation model developed in econometrics. Factor analysis was first introduced by Galton in 1869 and Pearson (Pearson and Lee, 1904). Spearman's (1904) research is the development of a general factor analysis model in his research relating to the structure of mental abilities, Spearman stated that the intercorrelation test between mental abilities can determine general ability factors and special ability factors. SEM is a combination of factor analysis and path analysis into one comprehensive statistical method. Path analysis itself is the forerunner of the structural equation of Sewwl Wright's research in the field of biometrics. Wright's contribution is to be able to show that the correlation between variables is related to the parameters of a model described by a path (path diagram). In SEM there are 2 variables, namely latent variables (exogenous and endogenous) and indicator variables. SEM has 2 equation models, namely the measurement equation model and the structural equation model. SEM also has 2 errors, namely the error for the measurement equation model and the error for the structural equation model. In general, SEM is formed from the relationship between latent variables and their respective indicator variables. To test whether the existing indicator variables are valid indicators for measuring the latent construct, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is used. Data analysis with SEM must meet the existing SEM assumptions. The model feasibility test is carried out based on the goodness of fit criteria. The stages in SEM analysis are theoretical model development, flow chart drawing, flow chart conversion into equation form, input matrix and model parameter estimation techniques, model problem identification, evacuating model parameter estimates, model interpretation and model modification.


Keywords


Structural Equation Model, Latent Variables, Indicator Variables, Errors in SEM, Measurement Equation Model, Structural Equation Model, CFA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ghozali, I. (2017). Model Persamaan Struktural konsep dan Aplikasi with Program Amos 24. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition. New York: Prentice Hall International.

Haryono, S., & Wardoyo, P. (2012). Structural Equatuon Modeling Untuk Penelitian Manajemen Menggunakan AMOS 18.00, Bekasi: Intermedia Personalia Utama

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide.

Santosa, J. (2006). Analisis Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Strategi Integrasi untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Pemasaran (Studi Kasus Distributor Makanan dan Minuman di Kota Semarang). Tesis. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Sasongko, E. N., Mustafid, & Rusgiyono, A. (2016). Penerapan Metode Structural Equation Modeling untuk Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akademik Terhadap Kualitas Website (Studi Kasus Pada Website Sia.undip.ac.id). GAUSSIAN, 5(3), 395-404.

Wijanto, S. H. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL 8.8: Konsep & Tutorial. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v1i3.295

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 M. Ihsan Khairi, Dwi Susanti, Sukono Sukono

Published By: 

IJEER: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia


IJEER Indexed By:

width=width= width= width= width= 

 

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats