Integrating Technologies in the New Normal: A Study of Blended Learning

Rahma Sakina, Eva Meidi Kulsum, Aip Syaepul Uyun

Abstract


The objective of this research is to describe how the teacher integrates technologies in blended learning and to analyze students’ perception and challenges in blended learning. The research was conducted in a private senior high school in Bandung and used a qualitative descriptive method. The data were collected through interview and questionnaire. The findings show that the teacher had already integrated technologies to run the process of teaching and learning in the new normal era as a replacement of a face to face learning due to Covid-19 pandemic. In the blended learning, the teacher integrated the variety of technologies in teaching-learning activities, namely zoom meeting and WhatsApp group chatting for the synchronous learning and she utilized google classroom, screencast o matic screen recorder, viva video editor, YouTube, and Quizizz the synchronous learning. The students perceived  blended learning positively and determined that it is it is one of the effective ways of teaching. The biggest challenge overcome by the teacher is more time needed to learn and adapt to this new situation where they must employ technology in our educational culture. For the students, the stability of internet connection also becomes major obstacle in blended learning. Apart from that, blended learning can be an option applied in the learning process in the current pandemic era.


Keywords


ICT, bleanded learning, new normal

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albashtawi, A., and AlBataineh, K. (2020). The Effectiveness of google classroom among EFL students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(11), 78–88.

Alebaikan, R., and Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: challenges and perspectives. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 18(1), 1-12.

Alnajdi, S. M. (2008). Hybrid Learning in Higher Education: Engagement Strategies. College & University Media Review, 14(1), 145–158.

Altun, M. (2015). The Integration of Technology into Foreign Language Teaching. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE), 6(1), 20–27.

Bryan, A., and Volchenkova, K. N. (2016). Blended Learning: Definition, Models, Implications for Higher Education. Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series “Education. Education Sciences,” 8(2), 24–30.

Cahyani, H. (2012). Teacher’s Attitude and Technology Use in Indonesian EFL Classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, 23(2), 130–148.

Chew, E., Jones, N., and Turner, D. (2008). The Marriage of Rousseau and Blended Learning: An Investigation of 3 Higher Educational Institutions’ Praxis, Advances in Web-Based Learning, LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg, 4834, 641--652.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 203-224.

Delors, J. (1998). Education for the twenty-first century: issues and prospects. UNESCO.

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., and Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16.

Fong, J., Wang, F. L., and Kwan, R. C. (2010). Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies and Applications. Information Science Reference.

Garrison, D., and Vaughan, N., D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Garrison, D. R., and Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. He Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

Gomez, J., and Igado, M. (2008). Blended learning: The key to success in a training company. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(8), 1-12.

Graham, C. R. (2004). Blending Learning System, Definition, Current Trends, andFuture Direction. Brigham Young University.

Graham, C. R., Allen, S., and Ure, D. (n.d.). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments (M. Khosrow). Idea Group Inc.

Guichon, N., and McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CAAL resource design. Science Direct, 36(1), 85–93.

Heigham, J., and Croker, R. S. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hrastinski, S. (2014). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. January 2008.

Idu, A. P., and Ojedapo, D. O. (2011). Indiscipline in secondary schools: A cry to all stakeholders in education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 81(2), 25-36.

Inoue, M., and Pengnate, W. (2018). Belief in foreign language learning and satisfaction with using Google classroom to submit online homework of undergraduate students. 5th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR), 618–621.

Kaplan, L. S., and Owings, W. A. (2001). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: Recommendations for Principals. NASSP Bulletin.

Lata, K. D. (2017). Blending Learning: An Inovative Approach. University of Lucknown. Uttar Pradese.

Levin, S., Whitsett, D., and Wood, G. (2013). Teaching MSW social work practice in a blended online learning environment. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33, 408-420.

Maarop, A. H., and Embi, M. A. (2016). Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Learning Institutions: A Review of Literature. International Education Studies, 9(3), 41-59.

Malik, R. S., and Hamied, F. A. (2014). Research Method: A Guide for First Time Researchers. UPI Press.

Mayadas, F. (1997). Asynchronous Learning Networks: A Sloan Foundation Perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1(1), 1–16.

Procter C.T. (2003). Blended Learning in Practice. www.ece.salford.ac.uk/proceedings/ papers/cp_03.rtf

Rachmadtullah, R., Rasmitadila, R., Humaira, M. A., Aliyyah, R. R., and Samsudin, A. (2020). Use of Blended Learning with Moodle : Study Effectiveness in Elementary School Teacher Education Students during The COVID-19 pandemic Use of Blended Learning with Moodle : Study Effectiveness in Elementary School Teacher Education Students during The COV. May.

Roblyer, M. D., and Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating educational technology into teaching (2nd ed.). Merrill.

Rooney, J. E. (2003). Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. 5, 26–32.

Sands, P. (2002). Inside outside, upside downside: Strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses. 6.

Shahabadi, M. M., and Uplane, M. (2015). Synchronous and Asynchronous e-learning Styles and Academic Performance of e-learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 129–138.

Sharma, G. (2016). Teacher Support as Determinant of Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 2(7), 1–9.

Staker, H., and Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute, May, 22.

Thompson, C. S. (2018). The Construct of ‘Respect’ in Teacher-Student Relationships: Exploring Dimensions of Ethics of Care and Sustainable Development. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(3), 42–60.

Yusuf, M. . (2005). Information and communication education: Analyzing the Nigerian national policy for information technology. International Education Journal, 6(3), 316–321.

Zhao. (2019). Using Quizizz to Integrate Fun Multiplayer Activity in the Accounting Classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 38–43.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijqrm.v1i4.81

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Rahma Sakina, Eva Meidi Kulsum, Aip Syaepul Uyun

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published By: 

IJQRM: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

 

IJQRM Indexed By: 

width= width= width= width= width= width= 

 


Lisensi Creative Commons Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.


View My Stats