Analysis The Effect Of Volatility On Potential Losses Mutual Fund Investments Using The ES-GARCH Method

Abram Chandra Aji Pamungkas, Betty Subartini, Dwi Susanti

Abstract


Investing in mutual funds has become a popular choice for investor who looking to participate in the capital markets with more diversified risk. However, the success of mutual fund investments depends on investors understanding the potential losses and opportunities that may arise during the investment period. Analyzing the risk of mutual fund investments is fundamental in helping investors comprehend potential losses. Therefore, research is conducted to understand potential losses by estimating asset price volatility and determining the maximum possible losses. The Expected Shortfall (ES) method proves useful in measuring downside risk and extreme loss potential in investments, but it is less effective in addressing nonlinear trends and the complexity of volatility patterns. Hence, a combination of the Expected Shortfall (ES) and Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) methods is employed to measure the risk of mutual fund investments. The research findings indicate that volatility has a positive impact on Value at Risk (VaR), and the potential maximum losses (ES) increase with higher volatility, indicating a greater risk.


Keywords


Investment; Mutual Funds; Risk Analysis; ES-GARCH

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bollerslev, T. 1986. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. Vol. 31, 1986, pp. 307327.

Cryer, J. D., and Chan, K. S., 2008, Time series analysis: with applications in R. Springer.

Irwandi, K. R. 2021. Estimation of Investment Risk of Consumer Sector Company Shares Using Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall.

Klugman, S., Panjer, ,HWillmot, G., 2004. Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, Wiley Interscience, New Jersey

Liu, Q., Charleston, M. A., Richards, S. A., & Holland, B. R. 2023. Performance of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion in Selecting Partition Models and Mixture Models. Systematic Biology, 72(1), 92–105.

Rizani, N. F. F., Mustafid, M., & Suparti, S. (2019). Application of Expected Shortfall Method in Measuring Stock Investment Risk with Garch Volatility Model. Jurnal Gaussian, 8(1), 184–193.

Ratnasari, V., & Nitivijaya, M. (2018). Modeling Inflation in Indonesia Using the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) Model Approach. Inferensi, 1(2), 71.

Yamai, Y. and Yoshiba, T. 2002. On the Validity of Value at Risk: Comparative Analysis with Expected Shortfall. Monetary and Economic Studies.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46336/ijqrm.v5i3.594

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Abram Chandra Aji Pamungkas, Betty Subartini, Dwi Susanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Published By: 

IJQRM: Jalan Riung Ampuh No. 3, Riung Bandung, Kota Bandung 40295, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

 

IJQRM Indexed By: 

width= width= width= width= width= width= 

 


Lisensi Creative Commons Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.


View My Stats